Data sourced from public records and updated periodically. Always verify with official university websites.

GlobalAdmit
Menu

Fudan vs MIT: Complete Comparison 2026

Side-by-side look at Fudan University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology: QS 2026 ranks 30 vs 1. Acceptance, tuition, language tests, and typical IB/A-L…

→ Fudan University profile → Massachusetts Institute of Technology profile

Summary comparison

Figures come from the GlobalAdmit dataset — always confirm on each university’s official admissions site.

Metric Fudan University Massachusetts Institute of Technology
QS rank 2026 30 1
Country CN 🇨🇳 US 🇺🇸
Acceptance rate 3% 4%
Tuition (intl / yr) $17,000 $60,000
Language (summary) IELTS 6.5+ · TOEFL 90+ · Duolingo 105+ IELTS 7+ · TOEFL 100+ · Duolingo 125+
IB typical IB ~40 42/45
A-Level typical A*A*A

Strengths

Fudan University

  • Top 30 global recognition in QS World University Rankings 2026.
  • Highly selective admissions profile.
  • Distinct academic brand and a global alumni footprint.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Globally elite QS band (top 10 in 2026).
  • Highly selective admissions profile.
  • Smaller cohorts and a tighter campus community.

Popular majors (overlap)

Where both profiles list the same popular major label (case-insensitive).

No overlapping popular-major labels in our dataset yet — open each profile for subject-level detail.

Which is right for you?

If rankings are your north star

MIT sits higher in QS 2026 (1 vs 30). That often correlates with research intensity and global name recognition — but Fudan can still win on programme fit, city, or cost.

If budget is the deciding factor

All-in signals favour Fudan on tuition plus living costs in our dataset — re-check official fee schedules because currency, programme, and visa rules move yearly.

If you are coming from IB / A-Levels / US high school

Compare the admission tabs on each profile: Fudan vs MIT can invert depending on whether you are optimising for IB typical offers, A-level expectations, or US-style testing. Use the evaluator after you narrow your list.